Use cases
Where you start depends on what you’re shipping.
Pick the door that fits — HTA submission, guideline update, sponsor deliverable, or your own PhD review. Each opens onto a different next step.
Solutions by audience
Find your team. Then go deep.
One platform, several destinations. Each opens onto the shipped engine — systematic review, network meta-analysis, and living reviews — framed for how your team is measured.
Living NMAPharma market accessKeep the comparison behind your submission live.For pharma teams →One shotBiotech & clinical devMap the comparator network before Phase 3.For biotech teams →
Locked recipesCROs & consultanciesComparator analyses that hold up, client after client.For CROs →Audit-readyHTA bodies & payersAn audit trail that survives the submission cycle.For HTA bodies →3–5 daysClinicians & guidelinesRecommendations that move with the evidence.For guideline groups →Free tierResearchersOne real review, end to end, free.For researchers →
Audit-readyPer-cycle provenance
HTA bodies, payers & national institutions. An audit trail that survives the submission cycle.
Per-cycle provenance and frozen rollup snapshots give the audit trail submissions need.
What changes
No shared tooling — each division reinvents the workflow.Central workspaces; library of sanctioned protocols.Black-box AI is a non-starter for regulatory submissions.Deterministic statistical engine; AI only for extraction, not stats.Complex comparator evidence spread across disconnected tools.Pairwise and network synthesis stay connected to the same evidence trail.
Cross-persona comparison
Same platform. Four very different success criteria.
| Dimension | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | ||||
| Primary outcome | Regulatory-grade evidence synthesis at scale | Evidence-based guideline update | Sponsor-ready review deliverable | Single thesis / publication |
| Team size | 50–500+ analysts, multi-division | 5–12 committee members | 10–50 analysts + PM | 1–3 researchers |
| Typical timeline | Continuous — living infrastructure | Monthly refresh cadence | 4–8 weeks per engagement | 6–12 weeks |
| Requirements | ||||
| Key rigour requirement | Determinism + procurement compliance | Source-linked audit trail for peer review | Reproducibility, sponsor audit-readiness | PRISMA compliance, reviewer acceptance |
| Advanced synthesis need | Traceable pairwise and network synthesis at scale | Pairwise and network synthesis for recommendations | Repeatable comparator evidence workflows | Pairwise meta-analysis basics |
| Deployment | Enterprise, SSO, GDPR-compliant | Small team workspace | Agency workspace + client handoff | Individual plan |
Start where you are
Pick the path that fits your team.
Every persona on this page has its own best next step. No wrong door — all roads lead to the same platform.